Nintendo Files Lawsuit Against US Government Over Trump-Era Tariffs
Nintendo Sues US Government Over Trump Tariffs

Nintendo Takes Legal Action Against US Government Over Controversial Tariffs

In a significant legal development, Nintendo has filed a lawsuit against the United States government, targeting tariffs imposed during the administration of former President Donald Trump. The legal action comes nearly a year after these trade measures first disrupted Nintendo's business operations in North America.

The Tariff Impact on Switch 2 Launch

In April 2025, just before the highly anticipated launch of the Nintendo Switch 2, President Trump implemented sweeping tariff increases affecting multiple countries, including key manufacturing centers like China and Vietnam. This unexpected policy move forced Nintendo to delay pre-orders for the Switch 2 in both the United States and Canada while the company assessed the potential financial implications.

Although Nintendo managed to maintain the console's base price despite the tariffs, the company did increase prices for various Switch 2 accessories in affected markets. Products including the Pro Controller and camera accessories saw price adjustments as Nintendo sought to offset the additional costs imposed by the new trade measures.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Legal Grounds for the Lawsuit

The lawsuit, filed by Nintendo of America on March 6, 2026, describes the Trump-era tariffs as "unlawful trade measures" that have allegedly resulted in the collection of more than $200 billion in tariffs on imports from nearly all countries. The legal filing states that Nintendo has been "substantially harmed by the unlawful execution and imposition of the unauthorized Executive Orders and corresponding payment of the IEEPA Duties."

This legal action follows a crucial Supreme Court decision last month that struck down the majority of Trump's tariffs. The court ruled that his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose these measures was illegal. In response, Trump imposed a temporary 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, but the Supreme Court's ruling has opened the door for numerous legal challenges.

Wider Legal Landscape and Industry Impact

Nintendo's lawsuit joins a growing wave of legal actions against the US government regarding these tariffs. More than two dozen states and over 1,000 companies, including major corporations like FedEx and Costco, have filed similar lawsuits seeking to recoup costs from what they claim were illegal tariff collections.

Nintendo is specifically seeking a refund "with interest" on any IEEPA duties the company paid, though the lawsuit does not specify an exact amount. The company's legal standing comes from its position as "the importer of record for goods that were subject to IEEPA Duties."

Manufacturing Strategy and Industry Context

Nintendo primarily manufactures Switch 2 consoles in China and Vietnam. Following last year's tariff implementation, the company reportedly shifted its import strategy to rely more heavily on units manufactured in Vietnam rather than China, allowing Nintendo to avoid some of the higher tariff costs and maintain the console's retail price point.

While Sony and Microsoft face similar situations with their PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S consoles manufactured in affected countries, neither company has yet filed lawsuits seeking tariff refunds, despite being in comparable positions regarding their manufacturing and import operations.

Future Challenges and Market Outlook

Beyond the tariff dispute, Nintendo faces additional potential challenges that could impact the Switch 2's pricing. The ongoing memory chip shortage represents another threat to production costs and retail pricing. During a recent investor Q&A session, Nintendo president Shuntaro Furukawa acknowledged the possibility of price increases but expressed confidence that the crisis would not significantly impact the company's hardware profitability in the coming financial year.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration

The legal process for tariff refunds has already seen significant developments. Last week, Judge Richard Eaton ruled that companies are entitled to refunds for these tariffs, and according to reports from The Wall Street Journal, a tariff refund system through Customs and Border Protection should become operational within 45 days. However, the timeline for when Nintendo and other companies might actually receive refunds remains uncertain as the legal proceedings continue to unfold.