Lee East, a 51-year-old van driver, was issued a £200 fixed penalty notice after being spotted urinating in a lay-by on the A12 near Colchester. East, who suffers from an enlarged prostate and bladder issues, said he felt “ridiculed” by a council enforcement officer who questioned him about his condition.
Confrontation and fine
The incident occurred in April when East was driving from Clacton, Essex. He pulled into a lay-by to relieve himself. A worker from Waste Investigations Support and Enforcement, a private contractor hired by the council, approached him. The worker, identified as Anna, filmed the encounter and issued the fine. In the video, she tells East that prostate problems are common among men, estimating that “out of 10, potentially five or six, minimum” have such issues. She also asked how often he takes medication.
East explained that his condition makes it unpredictable when he needs to urinate. He could pass a service station feeling fine, but moments later urgently need to stop. The fine was £200, reduced to £150 if paid within 15 days. East was warned that if the matter went to court, he could face a fine of up to £2,500 and a criminal record.
Appeal and aftermath
East successfully appealed the fine, and it was overturned. However, Colchester City Council stated that a subsequent offence would not be waived. East, a professional driver for 30 years, has since installed a portable toilet in his van to avoid being caught again. He described the experience as “disgusting” and “very angry,” adding that being questioned by a female officer was “not pleasant at all.” He said, “To feel like you’re being ridiculed, it’s absolutely disgusting.”
Council response
Colchester City Council defended its enforcement actions, stating that public urination is an offence that poses health risks and damages the environment. The council said it does not target specific groups but focuses on known hotspots like lay-bys. It acknowledged the need for facilities for lorry drivers but noted that National Highways is responsible for providing them on major A-roads. The council emphasised that enforcement officers are salaried and do not receive commission for fines, and that income from penalties covers enforcement and environmental services.
