Met Officer Threatens to Quit After Paedophile Avoids Prison for Schoolboy Assault
Police Officer Vows to Quit Over Paedophile's Suspended Sentence

Met Police Officer Vows to Quit Over Paedophile's Suspended Sentence

A Metropolitan Police officer has declared his intention to resign from the force after a paedophile who sexually assaulted a 12-year-old schoolboy and possessed thousands of child abuse images avoided a prison sentence in a controversial London court ruling. The case has sparked outrage among law enforcement professionals dedicated to combating child sexual exploitation.

Controversial Court Decision Sparks Police Outrage

Jordan Cave, a 28-year-old former IT technician at The Latymer School in Edmonton, received a suspended sentence despite pleading guilty to sexually assaulting a young boy at the school and possessing extensive collections of illegal child abuse material. Recorder Maryam Syed, presiding over the case at a London court, defended her decision as "not lenient" while imposing a series of non-custodial measures.

Instead of imprisonment, Cave will serve a four-month curfew, complete 200 hours of unpaid work, undertake 20 days of rehabilitation activity, and participate in 26 sessions of a specialised sex offender programme. He must also comply with a 10-year sexual harm prevention order and pay £800 in compensation to his victim.

Police Reaction to the Verdict

As the sentence was delivered, a visibly distressed officer from a specialist child sexual abuse investigation team expressed his disbelief through body language and verbal protest. The officer shook his head, held his hand to his face, and ultimately declared "I will actually quit the police based on this" as he left the courtroom.

Recorder Syed acknowledged the officer's reaction during proceedings, stating: "[The officer] is shaking his head, but I do recognise the hard work done by [him] and his colleagues." This recognition did little to assuage the officer's frustration with what he perceived as inadequate justice for serious crimes against children.

Details of the Offences and Investigation

The court heard disturbing details of Cave's crimes, which included:

  • Sexually assaulting a 12-year-old boy over his clothing at The Latymer School
  • Filming the assault and creating written documents detailing the incident
  • Possessing approximately 4,000 indecent images of children, including 907 Category A images depicting real children being abused
  • Storing videos showing boys aged 4-11 being subjected to rape, taping, and handcuffing

Police investigation began in 2022 after suspicious activity was detected on Cave's Dropbox account. Despite initially claiming he had been hacked and denying any sexual interest in children, forensic examination of his devices revealed extensive evidence of child sexual abuse material.

Legal Reasoning Behind Suspended Sentence

Recorder Syed cited several factors influencing her decision to suspend Cave's two-year prison sentence:

  1. Cave's diagnoses of autism and ADHD, which were presented as contributing to his "immaturity"
  2. The absence of further offending since the initial assault
  3. Recommendations from probation services and psychologist Victoria Appleyard, who expressed concerns about prison's potential negative impact
  4. Cave's early guilty pleas, which reduced his sentence from an initial four-year starting point

The judge acknowledged that a "normal adult without such difficulties" would have received at least a four-year custodial sentence, but reduced this to three years due to Cave's disorders, then further reduced it to two years for his guilty plea.

Broader Implications for Child Protection

This case highlights the emotional toll on police officers who regularly view traumatic child abuse material as part of their investigative duties. These professionals work to identify victims and track offenders while confronting the most disturbing aspects of human behaviour, making perceived failures in the justice system particularly demoralising.

Cave will remain under supervision for 12 months and must register as a sex offender. The case raises significant questions about sentencing consistency, the balance between rehabilitation and punishment for serious sexual offences, and the support needed for law enforcement personnel working in traumatic specialisms.

The Metropolitan Police have not commented publicly on the officer's threatened resignation, but the incident underscores growing concerns about retention and morale within specialist units dealing with child exploitation cases across London and the wider UK.