A major legal battle over brain injuries in rugby has suffered a severe setback after a judge rejected two crucial appeals. The decision leaves hundreds of former players at risk of having their claims dismissed before they even reach trial.
Appeals Denied on All Grounds
In a significant ruling, Mr Justice Dexter Dias upheld the earlier decisions of Senior Master Jeremy Cook. The judge found that the claimants' law firm, Rylands Garth, had failed to meet its legal obligations to disclose necessary medical records to the defendants. These defendants include World Rugby, the Rugby Football Union (RFU), the Wales Rugby Union (WRU), and the Rugby Football League (RFL).
The firm had been subject to an "unless order" demanding compliance by late October 2025. When they missed this deadline, Rylands Garth launched an appeal. They argued that Senior Master Cook had "erred in law" and that the orders were "disproportionate and oppressive". Justice Dias rejected these arguments on every point.
Hundreds of Claims Now in Jeopardy
The consequences of this ruling are stark, particularly for the rugby league case. Out of 321 claimants in rugby league, 180 now face having their claims struck out – representing approximately 80% of the total. In rugby union, the proportion is smaller but still substantial, affecting around 20% of the 773 former players involved.
Justice Dias was highly critical of Rylands Garth solicitor Richard Boardman. The judge cited "gross misunderstandings" about disclosure duties and "unconvincing explanations" for the failures. He stated it was reasonable for the managing judge to lack confidence in the firm's approach.
While Rylands Garth provided some medical material, they failed to hand over other requested documents, including full GP records and medical histories. The firm claimed the task's scale made it impossible. However, Justice Dias emphasised that solicitors taking on such substantial litigation have a professional duty to ensure they can comply with court orders.
Firm's Response and What Happens Next
A spokesperson for Rylands Garth said they were "grateful to the judge for providing greater clarity" on the disclosure level required. They reaffirmed their commitment to the former players and accused the defendants of attempting to hold up the case's progress.
The next hearings are scheduled for March. However, it is now likely that the defendants will apply to have all the affected cases struck out, which could cause further significant delays in a legal process that has already dragged on for five years. This latest development represents a huge blow to former players seeking accountability for neurological injuries sustained during their careers.
