MPs Demand Urgent UK Government Apology for Historic Forced Adoption Practices
MPs Urge UK Government to Apologize for Forced Adoption

MPs Urge Immediate Government Apology for Forced Adoption Practices

A cross-party group of MPs has issued a compelling demand for the UK government to urgently deliver a formal and public apology for the state's role in forced adoption practices. The report from the education select committee emphasizes that many victims are now approaching the end of their lives, making swift action critical to address this historical injustice.

Essential Steps for Redress and Healing

The committee's findings highlight that a formal apology is not merely symbolic but essential to correct the public record and alleviate the profound burdens endured by countless mothers and adoptees. Ministers are urged to collaborate closely with survivor groups to craft the apology's wording, ensuring it reflects the gravity of the trauma inflicted.

Between 1949 and 1976, an estimated 185,000 babies were forcibly taken from unmarried mothers in England and Wales, driven by a pervasive culture of shame surrounding pregnancy outside marriage. Religious organizations operated most of the mother and baby homes where these women were sent, with charities and local authorities actively involved in funding placements and securing adoptive parents.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Survivor Testimonies and Cross-Party Support

Helen Hayes MP, chair of the education select committee, described hearing from survivors as "one of the most moving days I have experienced in parliament." She stated, "Historical forced adoption practices coerced mothers and caused unimaginable trauma for multiple generations of women and profound, often devastating impacts for their children. Our report today is unequivocal – the government must urgently offer an unqualified apology for the state's role in shaping the forced adoption practices that harmed so many survivors."

While the Welsh and Scottish governments issued formal apologies in 2023, and the Catholic church in England and Wales apologized in 2016, the UK government has yet to follow suit. Children's minister Josh MacAlister indicated that an apology is "actively considering" and must be delivered by a senior government official to acknowledge the severity of the injustice.

Global Precedents and Ongoing Advocacy

Countries like Ireland and Australia have established financial compensation schemes after apologizing for similar coerced removals of children from unmarried mothers. In the UK, the campaign group Movement for an Adoption Apology (MAA) has threatened legal action due to the government's failure to provide meaningful redress or a formal apology.

The education committee concluded that although no single entity was solely responsible, government policies significantly shaped the environment that enabled the shaming and coercion of unmarried mothers. Additional recommendations include:

  • Improved access to adoption records for survivors.
  • Trauma-informed healthcare services tailored to affected individuals.
  • Guaranteed regular consultation opportunities between survivors and government representatives.

Charity Accountability and Enduring Harm

Organizations such as The Salvation Army and Barnardo's faced criticism in the report for initially failing to fully acknowledge their roles in forced adoptions, instead appearing to justify their actions. The report urges these charities to avoid "hiding behind historical societal norms" and to reflect on their legacies in light of any government apology.

Sally Ells, a 59-year-old cofounder of the Adult Adoptee Movement, shared her personal experience, stating, "We need a meaningful government apology to correct the harmful narrative that has been spun that we were unwanted and that we came from unfit mothers. It's acknowledging that adoption was forced and that it caused harm, and adult adoptees and mothers deserve an apology and we deserve redress." Ells, adopted in 1967, emphasized that the trauma is ongoing, with survivors more likely to suffer from serious mental health issues like post-traumatic stress disorder.

A government spokesperson responded, "This abhorrent practice should never have taken place, and our deepest sympathies are with all those affected. We take this issue extremely seriously and continue to engage with those affected to provide support."

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration